Skip to content

Apple’s US rules for linking players to your web shop

US iOS games can link players to a web shop, and Apple takes nothing on those sales for now. What is allowed, what Apple wants to charge, and what could change.

Last reviewed 9 min read12 sources

In short

  • In the US App Store, a game may show buttons and links to its own web checkout, including links that open the shop already logged in. Apple may show only a neutral notice that the player is leaving the app.
  • Apple charges 0% on those web purchases today. The Ninth Circuit ruled in December 2025 that Apple may charge a cost-based fee once the district court approves one. In August 2026 Apple proposed 15%, and the court has not ruled.
  • The Supreme Court agreed in June 2026 to hear Apple’s appeal of the contempt finding. In September 2026 the US government asked the Court to reverse the contempt finding on Apple’s 27% link fee. No argument date is set.
  • Plan on 0% now, and check that your web shop still pays at 5%, 10%, 15% and 27%.

What a US iOS game can do today

Apple rewrote guideline 3.1.1(a) in May 2025, days after a federal judge held it in contempt of court. The US exception now reads:

These entitlements are not required for developers to include buttons, external links, or other calls to action in their United States storefront apps.

Apple App Review Guidelines, 3.1.1(a)

In practice, a game on the US storefront can:

  • put a button in the in-game store that opens your web shop;
  • say why the player should go there, including a price or a bonus;
  • deep-link to a specific offer with the player already signed in;
  • place those links wherever Apple places its own in-app purchase buttons, at the same size.

Apple can show one screen as the player leaves. The courts limited it to “a neutral message apprising users that they are leaving the App Store.” The warning screen Apple used from 2024, which the Ninth Circuit’s opinion calls a “so-called scare screen”, is not allowed.

Everything above applies to apps on the US storefront only. Section 3.1.1(a) keeps the ban on steering in every other storefront.

What Apple can still control

The Ninth Circuit gave some of Apple’s control back in December 2025. Where a game offers both Apple’s in-app purchase and a web link, Apple may stop the web link from being more prominent than its own button. The court put it this way: Apple “must let developers place their buttons, links, or other calls to action in at least the same fonts, sizes, quantities, and places as Apple’s own.” Anything beyond parity is Apple’s call.

Apple may also apply its general content rules to the wording of the link, the same rules that govern the rest of the app.

What it costs: 0% today, and the fee Apple wants

The same December 2025 ruling reversed the district court’s permanent ban on any commission. Apple may charge a fee “based on the costs that are genuinely and reasonably necessary for its coordination of external links,” plus some payment for intellectual property it uses directly. It may not charge for its security and privacy features. And it may not charge anything yet:

Apple should not be able to charge any commission for linked-out purchases until such time as the district court has approved an appropriate fee.

Ninth Circuit opinion, 11 December 2025

On 13 August 2026 Apple filed its proposal with the district court: 15% as standard, 10% for Video Partner, News Partner and Mini Apps partners and for subscription renewals, and 5% for Small Business Program members. Judge Gonzalez Rogers has not ruled on it, and a ruling is some way off. Under the court’s remand order, Epic has 60 days to answer the proposal once Apple finishes handing over the documents behind it. In their joint report of 25 September 2026 both sides told the judge that the 60 days had not started, because they were still arguing over whose files Apple should search.

Here is what each outcome means for $100 of player spend, before your own payment costs:

Route Apple’s cut Reaches you before payment costs
In-app purchase, standard rate 30% $70
In-app purchase, Small Business Program (under $1M a year) 15% $85
Web link, today 0% $100
Web link at Apple’s proposed 5% (Small Business Program) 5% $95
Web link at Apple’s proposed 10% 10% $90
Web link at Apple’s proposed 15% 15% $85
Web link at the 27% Apple charged in 2024 27% $73

The web figures still have to pay for card processing, tax compliance, fraud and chargebacks. Those costs depend on whether you use a merchant of record or run payments yourself, and on your provider’s fee schedule. Two rows decide most business cases. A Small Business Program studio pays 15% in-app and, under Apple’s proposal, would pay 5% on the web, so the web route wins if payment costs stay under 10%. At the 27% rate Apple charged in 2024, the web route only beats standard in-app purchase if total payment costs stay under 3%.

Where the case stands

The entries up to April 2025 follow the Ninth Circuit’s account of the case in its December 2025 opinion.

Date Event
2021 District court orders Apple to allow buttons and links to other ways to pay.
16 Jan 2024 Supreme Court declines Apple’s first appeal. Apple’s US link entitlement, carrying a 27% commission, takes effect the same day.
30 Apr 2025 District court holds Apple in civil contempt. Bans any commission on linked purchases and any restriction on link design.
May 2025 Apple updates guideline 3.1.1(a) for the US storefront.
11 Dec 2025 Ninth Circuit upholds the contempt finding, overturns the total ban on commission, and sends the fee question back to the district court.
6 May 2026 Justice Kagan refuses to pause the Ninth Circuit’s ruling.
30 Jun 2026 Supreme Court agrees to hear Apple’s appeal, limited to one question.
13 Aug 2026 Apple proposes 15% / 10% / 5% on linked purchases. Justice Kagan refuses to pause the fee proceeding.
14 Sep 2026 Apple files its Supreme Court brief.
21 Sep 2026 The United States files a brief supporting neither party. It asks the Court to reverse the contempt finding on the 27% commission and uphold it on the “plain button” rule.
25 Sep 2026 Epic and Apple report that Epic’s 60 days to answer Apple’s fee proposal have not started.
13 Nov 2026 Epic’s Supreme Court brief is due.

What the Supreme Court case could change

The Court agreed to decide one question: whether a judge may hold a company in contempt for breaking the “spirit” of an injunction when the injunction does not mention the conduct in question. It declined a second question about whether the relief should cover only Epic.

Nine amicus briefs were filed by 21 September 2026, one of them from the United States. The government formally backs neither side, but it told the Court to reverse part of the judgment and affirm part. In its view the 2021 injunction barred Apple from prohibiting links, not from charging on the purchases they lead to, so the 27% commission was not clearly contempt. Apple’s rule allowing only “plain buttons” was clear contempt, because the injunction names both buttons and links and the courts found a plain button indistinguishable from a link. The government asked the Court to send Apple’s other link restrictions back to the lower courts.

The judgment of the court of appeals should be reversed in part, affirmed in part, and vacated in part.

Brief for the United States, No. 25-1311, 21 September 2026

If Apple wins, the April 2025 contempt order and the remedies that came with it could fall. The original 2021 injunction would still stand, and it still requires Apple to let US apps link to other ways to pay. Apple’s own response to that injunction in 2024 was the 27% link commission, which is why the table above includes a 27% row. The government’s brief makes that row more than a theoretical case. If Epic wins, the district court sets a cost-based fee and the case over the amount continues.

As of 5 October 2026 argument has not been scheduled, and Epic’s brief is due on 13 November. Our own reading of the Court’s usual calendar, not anything the Court has said, is that a case granted in June is argued the following term, which would put a decision in the first half of 2027 at the earliest.

Spending web currency on iOS, in any country

Guideline 3.1.3(b) is separate from the US ruling and applies worldwide. It lets a multiplatform game honor purchases made elsewhere:

Apps that operate across multiple platforms may allow users to access content, subscriptions, or features they have acquired in your app on other platforms or your web site, including consumable items in multi-platform games, provided those items are also available as in-app purchases within the app.

Apple App Review Guidelines, 3.1.3(b)

So a player in Germany can buy gems on your web shop and spend them in the iOS game, provided the same gems are on sale through in-app purchase. What the game cannot do outside the US is point the player to the web shop from inside the app, unless a regional rule allows it. Studios reach those players by email, social channels, community pages and PC or console versions of the game instead.

What studios are doing

Epic brought Fortnite back to the US App Store on 20 May 2025 and offered 20% back in Epic Rewards to players who paid through Epic. Tim Sweeney told The Verge in June 2025 that about 40% of US iOS players had chosen Epic’s payment option over Apple’s. That is a share of players, not of revenue. Listed mobile publishers report the same direction of travel: Playtika put its direct-to-consumer share at 39.3% of revenue in Q2 2026, up from 25.3% a year earlier. The D2C share tracker collects the figures from each earnings season.

  1. Confirm your provider supports logged-in deep links from the game into a specific offer.
  2. Match Apple’s placement and size for your web button. Parity is the limit Apple may enforce.
  3. Decide the web incentive. Bonus currency costs you nothing in cash; a lower price cuts margin on every sale.
  4. Model your economics at 0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 27% before you commit the roadmap to web-first pricing.
  5. Keep the link to US-storefront players only. Showing it to players on other storefronts breaks guideline 3.1.1(a).

Questions studios ask

Does Apple take a commission on purchases made through a link in a US iOS game?

Not as of 5 October 2026. The Ninth Circuit held that Apple may not charge any commission on linked-out purchases until the district court approves a fee. Apple has proposed 15%, 10% for some programs and subscription renewals, and 5% for Small Business Program members. None of these is in effect, and the court has set no date to decide.

Can the web shop offer more currency than the in-app store for the same price?

The court order bars Apple from restricting the style, language, placement or calls to action of your links, and studios already run web bonuses. Epic gave Fortnite players 20% back in Epic Rewards for paying through Epic. Check your own store terms and consumer law on price claims before advertising a discount.

Does the US ruling let me link out in other countries?

No. Apple’s guideline 3.1.1(a) still bars buttons, external links and other calls to action in every storefront except the United States, unless a regional entitlement applies (EU, Japan, Brazil and a few others). See the rest-of-world rules page.

Can players spend currency bought on the web inside the iOS app?

Yes, in any storefront. Guideline 3.1.3(b) lets multiplatform games give access to consumable items bought on other platforms or the web, provided those items are also sold as in-app purchases in the app.

Sources

  1. App Review Guidelines, sections 3.1.1, 3.1.1(a), 3.1.3 and 3.1.3(b) · Apple · checked 5 Oct 2026
  2. Epic Games v. Apple, No. 25-2935, opinion of 11 December 2025 · US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  3. Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc., No. 25-1311, docket · Supreme Court of the United States · checked 5 Oct 2026
  4. Brief for the United States as amicus curiae supporting neither party, No. 25-1311 · US Department of Justice, Office of the Solicitor General · 21 Sep 2026
  5. Apple Inc.’s Remand Proffer, Epic Games v. Apple, No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR, Dkt. 1708 · US District Court, Northern District of California (via CourtListener) · 13 Aug 2026
  6. Status report regarding Apple’s document production, Dkt. 1719 · US District Court, Northern District of California (via CourtListener) · 25 Sep 2026
  7. Apple proposes commissions of up to 15% for off-App Store purchases in the US · 9to5Mac · 13 Aug 2026
  8. App Store Small Business Program · Apple
  9. Fortnite returns to Apple’s App Store in the US · CNBC · 20 May 2025
  10. Playtika reports Q2 2026 financial results · Playtika · 6 Aug 2026
  11. Tim Sweeney interview on Fortnite’s return to iOS · The Verge · 3 Jun 2025
  12. Epic ramps up rewards to encourage players to use its payment system · PC Gamer

Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we will fix it and log the change.